JEWS ON THE BRAIN These figures show how much coverage Israel is receiving compared to other countries by various media, human rights, national governments and other organizations. The number of articles per citizen has been set to 1 for Peru and scaled appropriately for the other countries. The organizations are ranked in order of declining coverage. All numbers were obtained using a Google search of the form: country site:website.
Israel is not that important to all these people but is serving as their scape goat.
Scapegoating a minority is the ultimate evil - it leaves the minority no way out because it is outdone in terms of resources. The institutions below are vicarious antisemites aiding terrorists with their pens.
The United Nations has not been included. There is an excellent web page that covers UN, however, called eyeontheun.org
| |
Who's Your First?
BY YOUSSEF IBRAHIM
January 11, 2007
URL: http://www.nysun.com/article/46500
A maxim in Middle East affairs to Europeans and many American advocates of convoluted solutions is that settling the 100-year-old dispute between Israelis and Palestinian Arabs is a sine qua non to resolving other Middle East catastrophes.
Indeed Secretary of State Rice is reinvigorating this view with a new round of diplomacy in the Greater Middle East, which means inevitably putting pressure on Israel to accommodate Palestinian Arabs and Syrians with withdrawals from the West Bank and the Golan Heights.
But something doesn't click here, like the whole argument. It is a red herring from start to finish. The catastrophes in the Middle East lie in five areas:
• Internecine conflicts in Iraq, Lebanon and among Palestinian Arabs;
• Absence of representative governments for 350 million Arabs;
• Uneven distribution of wealth and corruption;
• Widespread illiteracy, poverty, and illness;
• Disenfranchisement of women.
Why does resolving any of these depend on good will in the Palestinian Arab areas?
Ever since they achieved independence in the past century, cliques of families and army officers have ruled Arabs, be they Al Sauds in Saudi Arabia, Al Qaddafis in Libya, Al Mubaraks in Egypt, Al Sabahs in Kuwait, etc. They will neither share power nor are willing to pass it along. These elites have robbed, generated corruption, instituted police states, and observed fitful development and great injustice — all ingredients of failed governments. Their actions have produced violent reactions including fundamentalist jihadis that now target them and the West, which supports them. The logical action here is to force them to reform and end repression at home.
But the "advocates" advance the view that once America "pressures" Israel to settle with Palestinian Arabs, enough goodwill will be generated to resolve other matters. Manifestly, this is nonsense. Arab dictators corner the market on power because they want it, not out of compassion for Palestinian Arabs.
The second catastrophe is growing sectarian divides, not only between Muslims — as in Shiites vs. Sunnis — but between Arabs of different ethnic, tribal, and religious backgrounds as with the Druze, Kurds, North African Berbers, and among tribal clans in Somalia, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia. These frictions have turned into gun battles and genocide in the Sudan, Lebanon, Iraq, Algeria, among others. Here, again, it would be quite a stretch to argue that Arabs and Muslims will stop killing each other once Israelis and Palestinian Arabs kiss and make up.
Indeed, the Arabs themselves never awaited Palestinian Arab accord before striking peace with Israel. Egypt and Jordan formalized peace treaties with Jerusalem that still hold, regardless.
Another canard is that the Palestinian Arabs themselves are ready for anything in the way of peace. As this is being written the only thing that Palestinian Arabs are gearing up for is a civil war of their own. Should Israel unilaterally return to the 1967 demarcation lines, leaving much of the West Bank, the follow up will be a Palestinian Arab blood bath. Gaza, evacuated by Israeli occupation troops more than a year ago, stands as a vivid example a mess of armed factions, extortion, corruption, and Islamic fundamentalism. Palestinian Arabs need rule of law before a settlement with Israel.
What of massive illiteracy among Arabs who, the United Nations reports, have left 25% of their populations with no education — neither able to read nor to write. That ranks as major problem without Israeli-Palestinian Arab ingredients behind it. Weapons accumulated by Arab regimes, including Egypt, which has been at peace with Israel since 1979, serve only two purposes: fighting other Muslims and generating billions of dollars in commissions for ruling families.
One has to be a die-hard conspiracy theorist to argue that any of these issues is related to the Israeli-Palestinian Arab conflict.
end of article.
|
THESE ARE THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS: |
 1. Association of University Teachers in the United Kingdom - no coverage of Peru, Saudi Arabia, or Morocco
|
 2. Aftenposten - Norwegian newspaper
|
 3. Radio Islam, hate site according to the Anti Defamation League. Based in Sweden.
|
 4. Al Jazeera - note that Israel is apparently much more important than Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia or Morocco. It also carries openly antisemitic articles (for example aljazeera.com on 1/31/6).
|
 5. The Council on American-Islamic Relations
|
 6. The New Republic - premiere leftwing magazine
|
 7. The Nation - premiere leftwing magazine
|
 8. National Public Radio (US liberal newsradio). They sell "Israel" but not Peru nor Sweden - check out: What NPR peddles (upper right hand corner - they pay Google more than anyone else does)
|
 9. Pugwash
|
 10. Washington Post. Feels Israel was a mistake.
|
 11. Time Magazine
|
 12. The Guardian
|
 13. The Detroit News
|
 14. Tidningarnas Telegrambyra as quoted in Svenska Dagbladet (Swedish equivalent of Associated Press)
|
 15. Associated Press
|
 16. Human Rights Watch - would you prefer living in Saudi Arabia or in Peru or in Morocco?
|
 17. Norwegian Parliament
|
 18. Svenska Dagbladet (premiere Swedish newspaper)
|
 19. CNN
|
 20. St. Petersburg Times
|
 21. BBC. Suicide bombers killing civilians in Israel are labelled "militants" but suicide bombers killing civilians in London are labelled "terrorists".
|
 22. Physicians for Human Rights USA (feeling threatened by their Jewish colleagues?)
|
 23. Swedish Parliament
|
 24. Jyllands-Posten (Danish newspaper who is blamed for Saudi boycott - yes, Saudi Arabia is covered much less than Israel even when the Saudi boycott is in the news. Sweden is a neighboring country.)
|
 25. The Swedish Government (recently changed - perhaps it will be better?)
|
 26. The Journal of Conflict Resolution
|
 27. The Ithaca Journal
|
 28. New York Times. Also publishes The Daily Star which apparently promotes Hezbollah's point of view.
|
 29. International Federation of Journalists (protects the rights of Hezbollah propagandists but not of journalists taken hostage by Hezbollah. And, yes, if you are looking for press freedom, it seems they suggest visiting Saudi Arabia.). Use the Advanced Search for documents on Press Freedom. Sweden is high because it likes to complain, not because it is a target.
|
 30. Amnesty International (human rights organization) - would you not rather be in Israel than in Saudi Arabia, or, for that matter, in Holland rather than in Morocco? And, yes, the Gulag is apparently in the US.
|
 31. War on Want (organization dedicated to fighting poverty, inequality and injustice - and apparently to promote antisemitism) - where would you rather be a poor worker?
|
 32. Committee to Protect Journalists (would you rather be a journalist in Saudi Arabia? CPJ writes that the most dangerous countries are Iraq, Algeria, Russia, Colombia, Philippines and India - all substantially less covered than Israel on a per citizen count)
|
 33. International Red Cross (apparently prefers jails in Saudi Arabia to those in Sweden - Saddam Hussein must have it wrong)
|